This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法下载提供了深入分析
Site feedback:Take our SurveyNew Window
Decoder --|PCM audio output| Speakers[Speakers]
表妹挨打的理由，往往只是些无关紧要的小事。比如，外公煮面时，把火腿肠连带外包装扔进锅里煮，她不想吃，挨打；抽背九九乘法表，被问到老师没教过的部分，背不出，挨打。继承了外公脾气的舅舅，每次回家，教育孩子的方式也如出一辙。